Saturday, September 30, 2023

U.S. Army Recalls 16,000 Ceramic Body Armor Plates

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By David Crane
defrev at gmail dot com

February 5, 2009

On January 29, 2009, the Washington Times reported that the U.S. Army is recalling "more than 16,000 sets of ceramic body armor plates that the Pentagon’s inspector general believes were not properly tested and could jeopardize the lives of U.S. service personnel." This came just one day after the Times reported  that the armor was "deemed unsafe by Inspector General Gordon S. Heddell." It would seem logical that "ceramic body armor plates" means ESAPI (also written E-SAPI) Level IV hard armor plates, but DefenseReview does not have confirmation on this, yet.

A DoD official is reported to have said that there are no reports of armor plate defects or deaths rusulting from the plates’ use. According to the Washington Times, the DoD official stated that the armor plates are being recalled "so that…

soldiers will not worry that they are wearing unsafe armor." The 16,000 recalled plates, all manufactured between 2005 and 2007, constitute 1.6 percent of the 1.9 million plates that the Army has purchased to date.

Danger Room over at Wired Blog Network has picked up on this story, and cites a March 31, 2008 DoD Inspector General Report on DOD Procurement Policy for Body Armor (Report No. D-2008-067) (PDF) that revealed that the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) "had procured billions of dollars in body armor without full testing." A new DoD Inspector General report that includes its latest findings on U.S. military body armor procurement is supposed to be released very soon (or possibly has already been released). However, a DoD official familiar with the situation has responded by saying that the "Army is going to push back" against this new DoD IG report, and accused the IG of "digging until something was found that was not very solid."

According to the Washington Times, U.S. Army and DoD officials are submitting (or have already submitted) information to the Inspector General’s office to challenge the latest findings. The Times also reported that in March 2008, the IG found that that "the Army did not follow federal requirements in procuring body armor components and identified deficiencies in 16 of 28 Army contracts."

The following is an excerpted portion of the Jan. 29 Washington Times article, titled EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Army recalls armor:

Maj. Clifford Yarbrough, who served with the 3rd Special Forces group in Afghanistan, told The Times that his unit, along with other Special Forces and the Delta Forces, were issued titanium plates. These plates, which are ordered by these special units under a separate budget, can withstand multiple hits by the enemy and have saved many lives, said Maj. Yarbrough, who now teaches at a high school in Arkansas.

The major, who has two enlisted sons, said that the ceramic plates issued to Army and Marine Corps personnel do not provide sufficient protection against close enemy fire.

"Interceptor vests are not fielded with the interceptor titanium that give the men more enhanced protection," he said. "We had guys who were engaged, and short of a 50 caliber, it would stop everything. They got a little trauma from the bruising. Normally, those rounds would go right through them."

End Excerpt

Army officials stand by the body armor that’s been fielded so far, and plan to challenge the IG’s March 2008 audit that found that in 11 of the 28 conracts, "adequate files were not kept and that it could not be determined whether the best informed decisions were made regarding procurement of body armor," according to the Times. This audit was apparently limited to Armya nd Marine Corps body armor contracts awarded and orders made between January 2004 and December 2006, which amounted to more than $5.2 billion.

Related Articles:

Chinese Armor-Piercing (AP) Sniper Rounds and XSAPI Body Armor

Flexible Biological Scalar Body Armor for Future Soldiers?

Army Acquisition Capos Fraudulently Alter Body Armor Test Results

KSEE 24 News Video Story on Attempted Sale of Dragon Skin Body Armor on eBay

Mystery: Attempt(s) to Sell Level IV Dragon Skin Body Armor on eBay

Pinnacle Armor Files Federal Lawsuit Against DOJ and NIJ: The Plot Thickens…

U.S. Army Stops Independent Testing of Interceptor Body Armor (UPDATE 1)

Why the U.S. Army Acquisition Mafia Fears Side-By-Side Body Armor Testing

Has the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Been Corrupted?

Dragon Skin Passes Again: NIJ-Certified Lab Test Validates 6-Year Warranty.

More Washington Corruption: DOJ Joins Efforts To Kill Dragon Skin

Pinnacle Armor Level IV Dragon Skin Passes ESAPI-FAT Test at Aberdeen

U.S. Army Recalls 16,000 Ceramic Body Armor Plates by

About David Crane

David Crane started publishing online in 2001. Since that time, governments, military organizations, Special Operators (i.e. professional trigger pullers), agencies, and civilian tactical shooters the world over have come to depend on Defense Review as the authoritative source of news and information on "the latest and greatest" in the field of military defense and tactical technology and hardware, including tactical firearms, ammunition, equipment, gear, and training.

Check Also

Valiant Dynamics EvolvR Combat Stock: 8-Position Rotating AR-15 Buttstock with ‘Spur Catch) for Tactical Armor Plate Carriers!

By David Crane david (at) defensereview (dot) com July 7, 2022 A company called Valiant …